.png)
Debt vs. Equity: Which One's Right for Your Business?
You've built something that's working. Revenue's coming in. The next move could take you from steady growth to real scale, but it'll take capital.
Now comes the million-dollar question (sometimes literally): Should you borrow, or bring in investors?
We've seen this decision reshape companies. Some founders thrive with leverage and keep full control. Others find freedom (not pressure) in giving up a slice of equity. The right answer depends on how you operate and grow.
Let's unpack it.
The Real Difference
At a glance:
- Debt means borrowing funds you'll repay with interest
- Equity means selling a portion of ownership in exchange for capital
Debt bets on your cash flow.
When you take on debt, lenders believe your current operations can reliably generate enough cash to pay them back. That means they're betting on your existing engine: your margins, recurring revenue, cost discipline, and cash conversion cycle.
The relationship ends when the loan is paid off. You keep full control, but you also carry all the risk. If growth slows or margins tighten, the obligation doesn't go away.
In short: debt rewards predictability. It's best for owners/founders who already have traction and want to scale what's working without giving up ownership.
Equity bets on your potential.
Equity investors, on the other hand, are buying into your future. They're less interested in this quarter's numbers and more focused on your growth story: market size, scalability, defensibility, and your ability to execute.
They take on more risk, but they also want a say. You're no longer simply building a business: you're building a boardroom.
Equity is ideal when you need more than just cash. Strategic partners often bring networks, guidance, and validation that accelerate your trajectory faster than debt ever could. But it comes at a price: control, pace, and privacy.
How Each Plays Out in Your Financials
Debt financing
You take on a liability. Interest is tax-deductible, but principal repayments are not. The upside: you keep 100% ownership. The downside: repayment pressure and tighter cash flow.
Here's an example:
You secure a $500K term loan at 8%. That's $40K a year in interest (deductible, yes), but it trims your monthly flexibility.
Pros: Keeps ownership, predictable cost.
Cons: Reduces cash cushion, higher risk if growth stalls.
Equity financing
You sell shares in your company. No monthly repayments, no liability, but you've invited new decision-makers into the room.
Example:
For simplicity, if you raise $500K for a 20% equity stake. When your company sells for $5M, the investor earns $1M (i.e. 20%). In actuality, there are many terms and conditions associated with equity ownership but we’re keeping it simple here.
Pros: No repayment risk, more runway.
Cons: Less control, long-term dilution.
The Cash Flow Question
When we model these options with clients, the first line we analyze isn't revenue, it's cash flow predictability.
Rule of thumb: If you can forecast next quarter's cash flow confidently, you can handle debt. If you can't, equity might buy you time and breathing room.
The Tax Reality
Taxes are where the true cost of capital often hides. Two identical companies can raise the same amount of money - one through debt, one through equity - and end up with very different after-tax results.
Here’s what actually happens behind the scenes.
How debt helps (and hurts) your tax position
When you borrow, every interest payment becomes a deductible expense, reducing your taxable income for the year. That means your effective cost of borrowing is lower than the stated interest rate.
For example:
If your business is taxed at 26.5% and you pay $50,000 in interest, you’ll save roughly $13,250 in taxes. Your real interest cost: closer to $36,750.
But the trade-off is liquidity. You’re committing to scheduled repayments, whether sales dip or not. That can limit your ability to reinvest in marketing, hiring, or product development, all of which could drive future growth.
In other words, debt improves tax efficiency but tightens operational flexibility.
How equity changes the picture
Equity financing doesn’t offer a deduction. Dividends you eventually pay investors come after tax. So while your tax bill may be higher in the short term, you’re not bleeding cash each month to service a loan.
And that freedom matters. The extra runway can help you hire, test, and expand faster, especially in early growth stages when reinvestment returns are high.
The flip side is that when your business matures and profits rise, you’ll share those gains with investors. The long-term cost of equity isn’t paid in interest, it’s paid in ownership.
Why timing matters
One of the biggest mistakes we see is raising equity too early. Founders trade 20-30% of their company to solve short-term cash flow problems that could’ve been bridged with smart, tax-efficient financing.
Later, when the business scales and valuations climb, that early dilution becomes very expensive.
Conversely, some founders hold off too long, using debt to fund growth when cash flow can’t realistically sustain repayments, leading to unnecessary stress and potential covenant breaches.
A Side-by-Side View: $500K Raise Example
Verdict:
Debt costs less overall - IF your cash flow can support it.
Hybrid Models That Split the Difference
Not every funding decision has to be binary. Between pure debt and pure equity lies a range of hybrid structures that balance control, flexibility, and cost.
These models are designed for founders who want to fuel growth without giving up too much ownership or who want investors aligned with milestones rather than immediate repayment.
Here are 3 that we often see work well in practice:
- Convertible Debt - It starts as a loan, but instead of being repaid in cash, it can convert into equity later, typically when a future financing round occurs or specific milestones are met. From an accounting perspective, it begins as debt on your balance sheet, which means you can deduct the interest expense. Once it converts, it becomes equity.
- Revenue-Based Financing (RBF) - Revenue-based financing ties repayments directly to your sales. Instead of fixed monthly payments, you pay a percentage of your monthly revenue until you’ve repaid an agreed multiple (for example, 1.3x to 1.8x the original investment). This makes it self-adjusting: in slow months, you pay less; in strong months, you pay more. It’s technically a loan, but behaves much closer to equity in flexibility. However, the total cost can be higher than traditional debt, and not all revenue types qualify - lenders prefer stable, recurring income streams like SaaS or subscription models.
- Government-Backed Loans and Grants - In Canada, programs like BDC Financing, IRAP, and SR&ED tax credits can dramatically change your cost of capital. These programs often provide low-interest loans, forgivable grants, or refundable tax credits designed to encourage innovation, hiring, or digital transformation.
Why Hybrid Financing Works
Hybrid models exist for one reason: they buy time and preserve optionality.
You don’t have to choose between strict repayment schedules and permanent dilution. You can design a structure that adapts as your company grows - raising debt today, converting it later, or pairing government programs with investor capital.
Our Take
When we evaluate funding options with clients, we look at both the numbers and the narrative:
- Can your business support debt operationally?
- Does your growth story attract the right investors?
- Are you planning for scale or stability?
Bottom Line
Debt builds independence. Equity builds partnerships. The best choice is the one that keeps your company healthy.
If you're weighing the options, we can help you quantify the trade-offs and stress-test each scenario before you commit.
Book a no-pressure call with our team - we'll walk you through the numbers, tax impact, and long-term implications so you can raise capital with confidence.


